Human Rights for All

CONTENTS ………………………………………………………………………………..    7
PROLOGUE. WHAT DO I MEAN WITH ”HUMAN RIGHTS FOR ALL”? ………            12
A democratic society? …………………………………………………………………..    12
A ROLE NEGLECTED BY THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA                                             12
Traditional NGOs at the power`s service ………………………………………….       14
THE INTERSECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND CIVIL RIGHTS ………………………………..                                                                             17
Freedom of Expression and Freedom of speech ……………………………….          17
THEN, WHAT SHOULD BE HUMAN RIGHTS FOR ALL IN A SOCIAL CONTEXT?………………………..                                                                        18
Wars are not an illustration of civilization………………………………………….        19
Human Rights for All is also advocacy for the memory of Human History.              19
Ergo:……………………………………………………………………………………………..20
Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………………….20
ABOUT CONTENTS OF THIS BOOK ………………………………………………………….20
INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………………… 23
1. FOUNDATION………………………………………………………………………………… 23
2. FOUNDATION MANIFEST ………………………………………………………………….  25
Summary…………………………………………………………………………………………..25
Historical background……………………………………………………………………………26
Sweden denied a seat in the UN Council for human rights …………………………      27
Human Rights breaches…………………………………………………………………………27
The Swedish section of Amnesty International………………………………………….    29
Other NGOs in Sweden…………………………………………………………………………..30
In brief…………………………………………………………………………………………………31
Remarks on economy and financing………………………………………………………..32
Remarks on activities character in reference to costs ………………………………..     32
Remarks on our position about the Sweden/NATO issue……………………………       32

DECONSTRUCTING KARINA SHYROKYKH’S & MARTIN KRAGH’S “BLACK KNIGHT NGOS AND INTERNATIONAL DISINFORMATION” ………………………………………..        33
PART 1. INTRODUCTION ………………………………………………………………………………….. 34
Finally in this Introduction: ……………………………………………………………………. 41
PART 2. CREDIBILITY IN PUBLISHING: DOES ‘PERCEIVED LEGITIMACY’ OUTWEIGH FACTUAL ACCURACY? ………………………………………………………………………………………………… 47
Legitimacy issues …………………………………………………………………………………. 48
About “claimed” legitimacy from the part of SWEDHR ……………………………… 50
1. The authors problematize whether paediatric competence existed within SWEDHR in an article about the White Helmets. ……………………………………… 51
2. Attributing to SWEDHR statements that are not ours: …………………………. 51
3. On whether SWEDHR had legitimacy to utter opinions on medical issues, for instance regarding consequences of “gas attacks” and related issues. ……….. 52
8
4. Facts VS. misrepresentations ……………………………………………………………… 54
Recapping……………………………………………………………………………………………. 59
PART 3. WHAT IS “DISINFORMATION” ACCORDING TO THE EXPERTS IN DISINFORMING?……… 61
Illogical premises………………………………………………………………………………….. 62
“Disinformation” according to the experts in disinforming ………………………… 62
Why Shyrokykh and Kragh failed in their “academic” attack on SWEDHR? …. 67
Are positions attributed to SWEDHR by Karina Shyrokykh and Martin Kragh truthful? ……………………………………………………………………………………………… 69
PART 4. SWEDHR ANALYSES ON THE WHITE HELMETS’ ALLEGATIONS OF CHEMICAL ATTACKS IN KHAN SHAYKHUN AND SARMIN WERE CORRECT AND VERIFIABLE. ………………………………….. 74
Summary of the first set of findings ………………………………………………………… 76
Summary of the second set of findings: …………………………………………………… 77
Our findings have never proven wrong……………………………………………………. 78
DEBUNKING CODA STORY

Analysis on the OPWC preliminary report on an alleged chemical attack in
Khan
Shaykhun………………………………………………………………………………..81
The Indicter articles as documents in the Security Council …………………………. 83
Debunking Shyrokykh and Kragh accusations about SWEDHR ”denying” the chemical attacks in
Syria……………………………………………………………………….. 85
CONCLUSION: ”UPPRÄTTELSEN”
(VINDICATION)………………………………………………………. 95
US Secretary of Defence Jim Mattis
………………………………………………………… 97
Other sarin attack allegation has never been commented by SWEDHR. ……… 97
French Defence Minister: ”We don’t have absolute confirmation ………………. 99
Epilogue………………………………………………………………………………..
…………….. 99
ART 5 ”ILLIBERAL MEDIA”?
…………………………………………………………………………… 108
Coordinated disinformation
…………………………………………………………………. 109
Anonymous sources
……………………………………………………………………………. 111
Illiberal
media?……………………………………………………………………..112
Further context (provided by AI):
………………………………………………………….. 114
NOMINATION OF JULIAN ASSANGE FOR NOBEL PEACE PRIZE 2023 ………………. 125
Summary
………………………………………………………………………………………126
My nomination of Julian Assange for the Nobel Peace Prize 2023 ……………. 126
All which lead us to the Democracy issue ………………………………………….. 127
Again, from Greek “Demos” (people) and “Kratos” (rule). The modern world has witnessed myriads of wars, most of them initiated by ‘kratos’ elites, most of them unelected. And essentially with the help of lies. …………………………. 127
INGRITY INITIATIVE SCANDAL REACHES SWEDEN AMIDST DECEIVING MEDIA ATE ON MARTIN KRAGH
…………………………………………………………………                          129
Non-scientific relevance in Kragh’s paper alleging “Russian disinformation in
Sweden”
……………………………………………………………………………………..133
Swedish state television (Svt) deceiving the Swedish public on the Kragh scandal
……………………………………………………………………………………..135
What shines by its absence in the Kragh debate …………………………………….. 137

Kragh, White Helmets, and SWEDHR…………………………………………………… 139
PROPAGANDA FOR WAR BY PROXY: REBUTTAL TO MARTIN KRAGH’S FLAWED ANALYSIS AND MISREPRESENTATIONS IN THE SWEDISH JOURNAL SOCIAL SCIENCES
………………………………………………………………………………………         148
PART 1. FROM THE POLTAVA DEFEAT TO THE MISREPRESENTATIONS IN THE SWEDISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES
………………………………………………………………………….                         149
Anti-Russian sentiment
………………………………………………………………………..                            152
All we want is
peace…………………………………………………………………………….               154
PART 2: THE FALSEHOODS
………………………………………………………………………………                      160
Kragh’s falsehood number one
……………………………………………………………..                                          160
Kragh’s falsehood number two
……………………………………………………………..                                           160
Kragh’s falsehood number three ………………………………………………..            161
ABOUT KRAGH CALLING US ”ACTIVISTS”
………………………………………………………………                                         162
ABOUT KRAGH CALLING US A “A GROUP OF POLITICAL ACTIVISTS WITH A BACKGROUND IN THE FAR LEFT” …………………………………………………………………………………..                  163
ABOUT KRAGH REPEATING THE DEFAMATIONS AND ERRONEOUS FACTA IN THE PRO NATO  PUBLICATION CODA STORY……………………………………………              163
THE HILL’S AND OTHER STREAM MEDIA JOURNALISTS’ INTERFERENCE ON SOVEREIGN OPINIONS OF PROFESSORS,.ACADEMICS, AND INDEPENDENT RESEARCHERS, COMPRISE INFRINGEMENTS TO ART 19 OF THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS …………………………………………………………                                  170
Summary. In a recent [2] and controversial [3] story by Senior Editor Chris York, the Huffington Post outbursts anew a worrisome attack against a dissident group of UK academics and researchers nucleated at the Working Group on Syria, Propaganda and Media. Embedded in this assault, as in others of the like launched by Western powers financing and arming jihadist- fundamentalist efforts aimed to suppress the secular government in Syria (for corporate profit), we may find attempts against freedom of expression which are incompatible with the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights. ………….. 171
When those in power begin to rule not only what we should or not research and express, but also how and where our expression should be published and transported, the times of fascism are here. Hence, the one of our Resistance.
……………………………………………………………………………………..171
1.
Introduction…………………………………………………………………………….
……… 172
2. What, who may be behind the Huff Post attacks of January 2020?……….. 177
3. The Coda Story narrative is conceptually identical to the Huff Post narrative. In which way are
they connected?………………………………………………………… 180
4. Article 19 of The Universal Declaration of Human Rights …………………….. 182
5. Guilt by Association Fallacy: From suggestive speculations to disinformation, and from there to academic repression …………………………………………………. 184
SWEDISH PROFESSORS AND DOCTORS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS (SWEDHR) RESPOND TO DER SPIEGEL ……………………………………………………………………….. 196

The true existence of SWEDHR in Sweden 198
Der Spiegel: “SWEDHR doctors explained that the White Helmet kill children” 200
REPLY TO DAGENS NYHETER ASSAULT ON SWEDISH DOCTORS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS 202
WHAT’S BEHIND THE FRONT-PAGE ATTACK ON SWEDHR BY SWEDEN’S LEADING NEWSPAPER? 203
1 208
The DN spin 208
3 210
Important items that we will taking up in this and upcoming rebuttals to untruthful statements concerning SWEDHR done by DN and Swedish mainstream media 210
4 215
Denouncing warmongers is a contribution to world peace 215
5 217
What are the real reasons of this remarkable political attack by DN and the
Swedish media, against an organization they claim it is “almost unknown”?
. 217
3. Another Swedish publication, “Fria Tider”, rebutted Dagens Nyheter
inaccurate report on SWEDHR 220
On SWEDHR Independence, and our right to give interviews to any outlet, even outside NATO, and regardless of the journalist’s or the outlet’s nationality . 222

What are violations of the Press Ethical Code? 222 7 223
STIGMATIZED BY DN’S GEOPOLITICAL RUSSOPHOBIA 223
IS THAT NOT, CULTURAL RACIST? 225
In the published dialogue published by DN, it instead stands 227
The criticism of DN and other media against SWEDHR does not address our results, the content of our investigations 227
MAINSTREAM JOURNALISTS ANGERED BY SWEDHR DENOUNCE OF UNETHICAL WAR PROPAGANDA. REPLY TO LE FIGARO 228
1. Le Figaro libel 232
2. Deceitful statement by Swedish TV journalist Bert Sundström 233
3. “Pinochet’s old companion” 234
5) The “spying” 238
(6) Le Figaro questions to whom? 238
(7) Assange and Donbass 238
SWEDISH DOCTORS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS REPLY TO GERMAN ARD/BR-TELEVISION ‘VERIFICATION TEAM’ REF. MY STATEMENTS IN A RT INTERVIEW ON THE SUBJECT WHITE HELMETS’ DOCTORED VIDEOS 243
German transcript of the interview in question by BR-Television 244
Debunking BR-Television Verification Team at ARD/BR 246
I 246
II 249
It should be relevant 250
III 250
IV 252
SWEDHR AND THE 75TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS. OPEN LETTER TO URSULA VON DER LEYEN 253
TO: URSULA VON DER LEYEN, PRESIDENT OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION. FROM: SWEDISH PROFESSORS AND DOCTORS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS 254